Moderators: bookfish, marillion, Admins
naesco wrote:As usual Catherham you have added nothing to this thread.
Fish_dave wrote:The greater solution is to support third world coastal dwellers and make the reefs something of value to them, thus getting the people at the source to protect that from which their livelyhoods stem. The lessor solution is to further restrict the importation of goods that are supporting coastal dwellers thus forcing them further into destructive practices such as logging and commercial food fishing.
Dave
Theophilus Parsons in 1788 wrote:"If a juror accepts as the law that which the judge states then that juror has accepted the exercise of absolute authority of a government employee and has surrendered a power and right that once was the citizen's safeguard of liberty."
GreshamH wrote:naesco wrote:I agree with Clipperton. News like this only hurts industry and our hobby.
I recently read somewhere that Obama is concerned about the reefs in the Indonesian area.
When he sends Obamites to explore this area and our industry/hobby they will report to him many negative issues. Sadly for the most part these matters can be addressed and should be addressed by industry who has the most to lose.
Failure to address the ongoing problems will only result in government involvement in our industry/hobby.
Begin at the beginning.
1. Solve the use of cyanide.
2. Solve the issue with the BG. This surely is a simple task as it involves one species and one area.
3. Implement a unsuitable species list USL.
I firmly believe that industry must organize itself on both sides of the oceans, both buyer and supplier.
I am afraid that time is not on our side.
My little non-informed Canadian pal, Clipperton is the fish in question, not a person you can agree with
You still have not gotten the clue politics really has no place in this forum.......must be you're getting old
And just because I can't let it slip by, it's BC, not BG
Terra Ferma wrote:GreshamH wrote:naesco wrote:I agree with Clipperton. News like this only hurts industry and our hobby.
I recently read somewhere that Obama is concerned about the reefs in the Indonesian area.
When he sends Obamites to explore this area and our industry/hobby they will report to him many negative issues. Sadly for the most part these matters can be addressed and should be addressed by industry who has the most to lose.
Failure to address the ongoing problems will only result in government involvement in our industry/hobby.
Begin at the beginning.
1. Solve the use of cyanide.
2. Solve the issue with the BG. This surely is a simple task as it involves one species and one area.
3. Implement a unsuitable species list USL.
I firmly believe that industry must organize itself on both sides of the oceans, both buyer and supplier.
I am afraid that time is not on our side.
My little non-informed Canadian pal, Clipperton is the fish in question, not a person you can agree with
You still have not gotten the clue politics really has no place in this forum.......must be you're getting old
And just because I can't let it slip by, it's BC, not BG
Wrong! There is a John Clipperton, and English privateer, whom the atoll was named after. However, he did pass in 1722. Surely he has modern day descendants.
aquaticvet1 wrote:This senseless " bucket full " of fish is one of the reasons we need change in this industry. These Clippertons should be made the poster child of wrong in this industry, I will do my best to accomplish that. I am digging in for confirmation but from what is rumored the majority or all are DEAD.
naesco wrote:Business is business.
aquaticvet1 wrote:The fish would have been better off in the ocean if things were not going to be done correctly. Not sure who would argue with that.
By the way, I did not start this thread, I am just a concerned reader following up.
Return to The Industry Behind the Hobby
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests