Moderators: bookfish, marillion, Admins
JeremyR wrote:So the boxes & paperwork had the proper scientific name on them, right? Not just "blue passer"?
Clownfish75 wrote:I dont understand why people think they need to know about the underlying story of this sort of stuff.
Personally i would never conduct my personal business on any forum, this is a business matter not something for open discussion with others, who might like to think they know about your industry.
I would like to state i dont know any details, nor do i understand your industry.
Christian
nemo24 wrote:The industry should avoid messes such as this, it ruins it for everyone.
naesco wrote:I agree with Clipperton. News like this only hurts industry and our hobby.
I recently read somewhere that Obama is concerned about the reefs in the Indonesian area.
When he sends Obamites to explore this area and our industry/hobby they will report to him many negative issues. Sadly for the most part these matters can be addressed and should be addressed by industry who has the most to lose.
Failure to address the ongoing problems will only result in government involvement in our industry/hobby.
Begin at the beginning.
1. Solve the use of cyanide.
2. Solve the issue with the BG. This surely is a simple task as it involves one species and one area.
3. Implement a unsuitable species list USL.
I firmly believe that industry must organize itself on both sides of the oceans, both buyer and supplier.
I am afraid that time is not on our side.
Fish_dave wrote:The greater solution is to support third world coastal dwellers and make the reefs something of value to them, thus getting the people at the source to protect that from which their livelyhoods stem. The lessor solution is to further restrict the importation of goods that are supporting coastal dwellers thus forcing them further into destructive practices such as logging and commercial food fishing.
Dave
Return to The Industry Behind the Hobby
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests