by Randy Holmes-Farley » September 12th, 2001, 8:45 am
Bob:
What I'm saying is that I basically agree with BReefCase's last post in the other thread. That is, that the advantages are these:
1. If you get adequate Ca++ and alk, but the pH always runs too high, adding vinegar after the solution has become saturated (with no extra solids) is a suitable way to lower the pH. Just adding some vinegar directly to the sump will also have this same effect (I've done this).
2. If you don't quite get enough Ca++ and alk from saturated limewater, adding vinegar before dissolving the Ca(OH)2 (and adding more solids to permit greater dissolution), will be a suitable way to get some more. Craig claims about 36% more can be had this way.
3. I don't know if many people will benefit from the carbon source idea as it relates to conversion of nitrate to N2. If organics were the limiting factor in that reaction, then it might help. I just don't know if organics are in such short supply in most tanks.
The potential disadvantages are these (IMO):
1. It's a complication to worry about that is, IMO, unnecessary for newbies to get involved with.
2. The potential to help solubilize undesirable impurities in limewater is a possible concern. Tuus effect is minor for small amounts of vinegar (as Craig pointed out a few days ago for lead), but gets bigger as the amount of vinegar rises. At the point of dissolving all of the lime that you use with a lot of vinegar and forming a low pH solution (say, 7), you potentially send many of the impurities into the tank (as you do when using milky limewater). If one chooses to do this, I'd advise using a high quality lime.
3. There is the potential for unusual algal growths that some have reported, though it's hard to prove that the people that report these had it result from the vinegar.