ozboy22 wrote:thanks for that vit's
Now after trying beaslbob thought's on this way and do every thing that he ask,
after reading forums upon forums i have not seen to many people do this
i just did it to see if it works
Which to me it did.
Now i hope this test that i have done has proven that it can be done and will mantain the tank.
One more thing is that beaslbob has said to add more plants to remove my high nitrate levels ,which was done today
So on the weekend i will post my find's and post here and call this test over.
what are people's thought's on this.
after what 8 months of trying this.
beaslbob wrote:Don't worry Oz. people used to maintaining 1000s g of commercial tanks by massive daily water changes simply can not grasp the concept of a stable bioload being balanced out and stabilized by plant life and nothing else.
But you can because you left the tank alone for months.
And Cal can because he hasn't had to clean his glass for over a year.
Meanwhile, I have come home to at least one 10g for the last 28 years with a stable population of 20-30 fish, no algae, no filtration, no circulation, and no water changes.
But then this may simply be a difference between commercial facility and tanks in living rooms and bedrooms where people have to live (and sleep). And being maintained by people who have other jobs to go to also.
So why are your nitrates up? Simple. Because the nitrate consumers have not kept up with the nitrates. So you have two options. Massive invasive, upsetting, daily water changes. Or simply add more live plants to get the tank back in balance. I hope you chose the latter
FWIW here is a nitrate test of my 10g with 20-30 descendants of the original cycle trio added over 4 years ago.
oh yea. Testing right after feeding should not vary the test results much if any at all
I hope you keep us posted. Monthly would be fine.
vitz wrote:your halfwitted improperly tested and fooishly observed anecdotal gobbledygook
vitz wrote:why does everyone but you acknowledge and agree with the old adage 'the solution to pollution is dilution' ?![]()
![]()
...
?
beaslbob wrote:vitz wrote:why does everyone but you acknowledge and agree with the old adage 'the solution to pollution is dilution' ?![]()
![]()
...
?
I give up Why?
Every envirmental engineer I have talked two, all 2 of them, have stated the same thing. Dilution is not to solution to polution. The solution is to process the polution and make it safe. Like making sure nitrates and phosphates are unmeasureable with a heavy bioload after 4 years of operation. Even though not a single drop of water has been removed from the system. And no filter has been used. The only thing exported from my FW and salt tanks is plant life.
.02
beaslbob wrote:vitz wrote:why does everyone but you acknowledge and agree with the old adage 'the solution to pollution is dilution' ?![]()
![]()
...
?
I give up Why?
Every envirmental engineer I have talked two, all 2 of them, have stated the same thing. Dilution is not to solution to polution. The solution is to process the polution and make it safe. Like making sure nitrates and phosphates are unmeasureable with a heavy bioload after 4 years of operation. Even though not a single drop of water has been removed from the system. And no filter has been used. The only thing exported from my FW and salt tanks is plant life.
.02
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest